Women of the World Unite! Us girls need to do more to ease the pain
Many women nearly have it all, so those currently inactive must be encouraged and empowered to make a difference in society. The more campaign and pressure groups there are the better.
By Natasha Proietto on Monday, February 2nd, 2009 - 1,088 words.
We’re stronger than ever. No we really are, no matter what the doomsayers would have you think. Feminism in the positive sense of the word is on the up. We’re respected as talented and skilled workers, caring mothers and daughters and loyal friends. But we need to do more to encourage human compassion. Of course in every culture and country there are those women left behind, but it’s not for want of trying, given the number of charitable initiatives and general awareness of the problems they face. In the age of L’Oreal and haute couture, of Beyonce and Shakira, we have the power to fight not just for ourselves but for others. What is strange is that we often choose not to make use of it; to look after ourselves not just first but only and to let men lead the way — and not always in the right direction. Is subjugation thus inherent? The matriarchy appears to be locked inside the words and images of traditional fairy tales; the powerful Saxon Queens replaced by the iconic Carla Bruni.
Women have long been portrayed in all forms of literature as subversive, a danger to the social order. Mostly this is done somewhat unwittingly, without the author being fully conscious of it. Interestingly, it is the women who are depicted as the most powerful and “feministic” who do the most damage: Greek figures such Medea and the Amazon warriors, Shakespearean anti-heroines like Lady Macbeth, trophy girls in the works of John Fowles, are all examples of how strong women are ultimately to be reviled for their power and ambitions, morphing into grotesque caricatures. Yet women who do as they are told are more likely to be remembered as the strong ones (think of all the maternal or do-gooding, long-suffering types in any drama or literature you’ve read). Domestic violence, still a relative taboo in our enlightened times, is proof of the continued desire to neutralize the power of women: you can be powerful but only if you don’t leave me.
There have been many positive developments but they will stop short of producing real results unless women push for more: for instance equal pay campaigns are underway but have not yet bridged the gap: Support Equal Pay (legal rep campaign), Fair Play on Women’s Pay (Conservative Party campaign), Government Equality legislation. Equal pay isn’t everything, though if global statistics are analyzed the disparity in earning power is still very shocking: money is something that can be objectively measured but we make the error of presuming that other things are too. Equality is such a vague concept when applied to men and women. Given that no human being can objectively equal another in any way except for a subjective judgment by others, we are taking the debate the wrong way by insisting on a notion of equality that can be enforced only sporadically, case by case, in the real world.
I am afraid that in an age where female emancipation is prized and where women have much more access to power and money, we are becoming desensitized to reports of violence against them. Not just against poorer, less educated women who have had fewer chances in life but against women and children in general. The recent vicious slaying of TV news anchorwoman Anne Presley shocked America, but not so much that the story kept going for more than a few days. Darfur is talked about but we naturally prefer to block out the painful events to stop ourselves getting too down.
That is the trouble: these stories should run a lot longer, to make sure the point is rammed home that we have to keep putting pressure on rulers every day to take violence against women seriously. And women who are hurt need to be remembered for their achievements, not turned into taboos. We shouldn’t dwell on horrific events but ensure that campaigns against them, whether practical, moral or both, receive continued support. Don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying that men are any less important and if a man wanted to start a campaign highlighting violence against men he would have my full support. It’s just that I can’t be the only girl who gets extremely angry about the level of abuse against females in society. Just because we can’t stop all of it doesn’t mean we should just give up. If you stop just one incident you’ve saved a life.
Women are trying to make a stand but they need to be supported more at all levels. The more anti-knife marches, Mothers Against Murder and Aggression, anti-rape groups we have the better. A little extra funding here or there can make all the difference. Some politicians are so sheltered from the realities of the street that they simply do not understand what it is like to have to walk home alone in a dodgy district. The role of the press is also important. Those newspapers that take strong but calm opposition against violence are to be applauded, for ensuring readers do not become desensitized and view each case as a separate tragedy.
The facts, laid out in an unimpassioned way, render the story far more striking than the hysterical reaction by some other press outlets, that leads to the story seeming unreal and thus to be shoved away with all the other bad news. An empirical rather than sensational stance is vital in giving victims the respect they deserve. More factual reporting of this sort has a positive ripple effect throughout society because people are still shocked, sentences are more fitting: there are more deterrents and better policing because people respect themselves enough not to stand for becoming victims, whether pre or post-crime.
Yet in all countries, traumas, like the Juarez Femicide in Mexico, are still ongoing and to ensure they are not forgotten we can never stop the fight. This is not to say that men cannot partake in such campaigns, simply that women should engage as much as they can and use their femininity to do good. How women see themselves is paramount. In some cultures it is now evident that women genuinely view themselves through the eyes of society as a whole, not just the male parts of it, but we need to get further beyond the cosmetic — and the cosmetics.
7 Comments
Leave a Reply
Natasha Proietto
Geneva, Switzerland
Natasha is a writer and broadcaster focusing on historical and cultural journalism, travel writing and current affairs and arts analysis. She graduated from Oxford with a Joint Schools Honours Degree in History and Modern Languages and has a Masters from UCL in International Relations and Russian. She has written for the drama and review pages of Oxford student newspapers and publications, magazines including History Today and currently broadcasts on national radio in Switzerland. She has just finished translating an award-winning novel and supports various humanitarian and welfare associations.
Articles by this author
-
Transient Solutions: Walls that made history
The former Chancellor of West Germany, Willy Brandt, probably came close to defining how such structures often come to be judged by history when he coined the phrase “the Wall of Shame” to describe the Berlin wall. Not all walls are shameful but they do run a heavy risk of being considered a crude solution at best, even by those who erect them.
-
History in Politics: The perils of invoking the past
Current political debate is suffering from the lack of nuances introduced, the desire for a sound bite and a quick fix, the laxity of believing that now is not a good time to debate, even amongst friends. Every point has to be debated in detail instead of an over-reliance on shady historical metaphors. Sometimes it seems we hear and read the same things over and again. Debate is all we have to move forward
-
David Starkey's criticism of female historians is wrong
British historian David Starkey recently said that history has been "feminized", but this shows a misunderstanding of the effect the new army of female historians has had
-
Death, scandal and the erosion of privacy
The public death of Jade Goody and uproar over Google Street maps in the UK has again bought up the defining issue of our day: privacy, or the lack of it. Natasha Proietto disentangles how we got here and what it portends for the future
-
In defense of nepotism
Nepotism gets a bad press, but it is often not all bad.
-
Monsters of the modern age: The United States, cigarettes and bankers
Not long ago, large parts of British society believed in monsters, but the residue of that mindset is still with us.
-
Women of the World Unite! Us girls need to do more to ease the pain
Many women nearly have it all, so those currently inactive must be encouraged and empowered to make a difference in society. The more campaign and pressure groups there are the better.
-
The Swiss people, at a crossroads, vote on immigration reform
On February 8th the Swiss people will have a referendum on whether to open up bilateral accords with Romania and Bulgaria. In this complex democracy, the debate is no divided along ideological lines, but the result will have massive implications for the future of the country.

(+2 rating, 2 votes)
this is interesting and very enlightening. i also find it optimistic that women are still feminists in some parts of the world. at the same time there are 2 aspects which are not mentioned here the 1 is the global regression- females who are afraid to admit of being feminists in fear that they will remain alone and perceived as manly. for some reason feminism is badly marketed and even males are very much afraid of women rights activists, it is all because the message society often projects for these women is that if you transcend above the cosmetics you will be of nobodys interest because the only interest in women is the sexual one.
the 2nd aspect which was omitted for political- correct reasons or similar,is cultural boundaries. some traditional societies in the world (and here i shall not say which due to political correct) still raise women in illiteracy and ignorance to the basics . these women know nothing about their basic rights and they are the modern form of slavery. they are taught from a very young age that they are dirty and in some countries , such as Iran (and here im not being politically correct but it is true) women are executed as we speak for things that seem commonplace in the west. sure rape, abuse and discrimination exist in the west as well , but at least they are not defended by laws.
at the same time as women fight for equal pay and opportunities they must never forget that in some parts of the world women are denied the basics. much more needed to be written about it and much more protest should be done against it.
While I definitely agree on the fact that the word "feminist" is being seen as negative, I have to strongly disagree on the cultural argument. It generally makes my blood boil when usin the western world tend to see ourselves as the "more cultivated" part of the world and look to the Middle East as a prime example of woman oppression. It's true women are being supressed, yes, but it really doesn't take much to find examples just as bad in the Western world. Rape and abuse might not be defended by the law here, but that doesn't mean it doesn't happen. *cont*
*cont* Every day, women in "civilized" countries (whatever that is…) are forced to sit in rape cases in court and describe to a (mostly male) jury what they were wearing, how much they'd been drinking and what their previous sexual history looks like. No one ever bothers to ask the man what he was wearing at the time of the event, funnily enough. Just because it's not defended byt he law doesn't mean it doesn't exist. I understand in England (and maybe also The States, I'm not sure?), those kind of questions aren't allowed in court but here in Sweden, for some reason, they're still considered important -and we're supposed to be the world's #1 in equality between sexes! Also, when it comes to opression in the Middle East, religion is a much bigger factor in those countries compared to here (unless maybe in The States) where religion is incorporated into law and as far as I'm concerned that is also a religious issue -not a cultural one.
Very true about the cultural boundaries, but it must also be highlighted that while in the West certain laws are more strongly in favour of womens' rights, there are still many aspects of law which undermine the female. For instance, the inability to prove domestic violence and therefore to correctly deal with perpetrators in some cases is still pronounced, even in the most female-friendly societies. Similarly, not all women in non-western countries get a raw deal. If we compartmentalize between Western and 'other' women I am not sure this leads to more success in highlighting the problems they all face, in one way or another.
What do you mean! women complain that they want more rights but then still want to be treated like ladies! You can't hit a woman but hitting a man is fine! thats equality right???? Also a recent survey said that 95% of all women would secretly prefer to stay at home and not work! Finally i heard on the O'reilly factor that the main complainers about womens pay etc are non-christian surprise surprise!! you atheist liberals will always find something to bitch about. Just get on with your lives without looking for more money – that you hope comrade Obama will dole out to you as you liberals totally fuck this great nation of ours!
when a woman has enough money to stand on her own, her relationship to her husband is of equality, thus she does not depend on him and he can not proclaim his authority upon her. statistics or not it is the truth. the fact society makes these women feel bad about themselves doesnt mean that its the right way.
As for wanting to be "treated like a lady", I personally find that just another gender role stereotyping trap that I would rather see go away. Hitting someone is never okay, no matter what their gender although I'm sure you could find people that disagree with me on that. I'm not liking your tone implying that women prefer to be lazy, not work, and live off he rhusban'd paycheck – I'm sure there are women that feel that way, but that's created by the fact that so many of us are raised to be stupid and not think.
And, just between you and me…I wouldn't really trust anything that's being said on the O'Reilly Factor -or Fox News, for that matter. They tend to filter their newsflow quite radically you know. ;o)