Wednesday, May 16th, 2012

Tracing Food: Why Japan has the right idea on meat production

North America needs to move in the direction Japan has regarding traceability of food sources, specifically meat. The big American food suppliers might be a touch more trust worthy if they were willing to offer all relevant information on animal products at the touch of a button.

By on Sunday, January 3rd, 2010 - 689 words.

aeon-trace-01Factory farms are feeding millions of people globally with unsustainable beef, pork and chickens. These large-scale producers of livestock in the United States and Canada have been jeopardizing the food supply for too long. According to a web-site devoted to changing the way we think about our food, the problems associated with factory farming include: excessive numbers of animals confined closely together, disregard for animal welfare, misuse of pharmaceuticals, mismanagement of animal waste, and socially irresponsible corporate ownership.

In the documentary film Food Inc, released in 2008, Robert Kenner takes the veil off North American factory food production and exposes the underlying and inherent problems associated with the disconnect between customers and the farmers and companies that increasingly supply their meat. The film and subsequent book make it very clear that the small group of companies that control the North American food production are unwilling to discuss their business with journalists and the media. These North American companies are beyond secretive, and have often resorted to lawsuits and thinly hidden threats if anyone associated with their business speaks publicly or cooperates in anyway with journalists or documentary film makers.

However, Japanese companies and government agencies have been focusing on informing customers, in stark contradiction to North American producers. In June of 2003, the Japanese government passed legislation requiring traceability from the farm through retail sale. On Japanese beef there exists a 10 digit Individual Identification Number that each cow is assigned at birth (with an ear tag) and this number follows the cow through his life, slaughter and sale to the end customer. The process was put in place after the outbreak of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) in the local Japanese cattle herd.

As part of the traceability efforts, Japanese customers have access to various facts about the meat they purchase and consume. This information is available at the point of retail, in real time. Japanese corporations also helped lead the push on meat traceability and it was not something forced on them by government officials and regulators.

“The Aeon Company has developed one of the most comprehensive assurance systems for domestic Wagyu beef. Under this system, customers can enter a 10-digit code into a computer located in the meat sales area to obtain information about the beef they are purchasing. The consumer can obtain a production record certificate that traces the meat back to the birth of the animal from which it was harvested, the BSE testing certificate, and a photograph of the livestock producer. This information is also accessible from the customer’s home computer,” reports a 2003 article at the outset of the new traceability regulations.

Currently, a Japanese customer can walk into a local grocery store equipped with a cell-phone and find out the following information about the piece of steak they are going to buy: birth date, sex, breed, location of cattle, transfer status, transfer date and the owners name and address courtesy of the following web-site, which surprisingly is available in both English and Japanese. Many meat specialty shops will verbally provide customers this information as they interact with shop staff.

The Japanese traceability system ensures customers that their beef is safe, and with such free-flowing information, provides a model of success that North American consumers should be taking note of. Japanese food companies have been putting pictures of the farmers and producers of food supplies on packaging for years.

I recently noticed there was a picture on the label of my delicious pastry, as I opened it. It was then explained to me that this system helps Japanese customers feel connected with the producer or farmer. Further than that, it also logically affects the attitude of the farmer or producer. It makes the person directly responsible for the food known to the consumer who will eat the product. This in-turn makes the producer more responsible and lowers the chance for negligence. The information provided through a trace of the 10 digit Individual Identification Number provides the farmer’s name and address, having the same influence on his actions to act responsibly.

North America needs to move in the direction Japan has regarding traceability of food sources, specifically meat. The big American food suppliers might be a touch more trust worthy if they were willing to offer all relevant information on animal products at the touch of a button.

12 Comments

  1. Jordan Pearson says:

    Great article Randy on Japanese meat production, Randy — and as you and I both know, they're also have the right idea on meat reception, nudge, nudge, wink, wink.

  2. Rod H says:

    And it traces it back to the same farms that the author criticizes – the farms that are feeding millions of people globally; the same farms that are providing Japan with a safe, wholesome, great tasting product at a reasonable cost – regardless of size. Unbelievable…

  3. Former Ag Teacher says:

    Poehlman's commentary is so off base that one has to question whether he ever checked any facts before he sat down and typed out these thoughts. The United States uses a traceability system called COOL (country or origin labeling). The North American food producing companies Poehlman derides so dismissivly argued for a national animal identification system that would have put a number on food animals to enable tracing them all the way through the supply chain back to their farm or origin. But small thinking, regressive agriculture advocates, especially organic producers took the polical route with vengance and killed it.

    • Traceability Guy says:

      Sorry to point this out, but that's just plain wrong. First off, COOL is not a traceability system, it's a labelling requirement, and as it stands, almost two-thirds of those who are required to follow it in the US are not doing so. Second, NAIS is being killed by livestock producers (specifically cattle producers), not organic producers who feel NAIS is too expensive and too invasive with respect to the information they would need to provide into the system. I don't agree with them in the least, but let's get the facts straight.

      Good article Randy.

  4. Japanese Consumer says:

    Great article Randy!

    Former Ag Teacher, the Japanese consumer has the information, while the US consumer does not. You provide no evidence at all to back up the claim that "especially organic producers" were against giving US consumers that information.

  5. Japanese Consumer says:

    Great article Randy!

    Former Ag Teacher, the Japanese consumer has the information, while the US consumer does not. You provide no evidence at all to back up the claim that "especially organic producers" were against giving US consumers that information.

  6. foxsculptor says:

    Yes this is a good approach, and it needs to be about how we consume meat.
    Rather than lots of cheep factory farmed animals, eat good quality, well reared meat occasionally.
    Have you hear of Feastarian? Which is this idea by promoting the positive benefits to the individual, the animal welfare and the planets carbon emissions.
    I recommend it, and I have taken to living this way.

  7. 救世主 says:

    Go vegan!

  8. Dr. Intelligence says:

    Well everyone is a complete moron because remember it comes from Factory Farms, filled with dangerous antibiotics that give us cancer, mistreatment of animals, its like your supporting the holocaust, but with animals. But of course since everyone is american and ignorant why would it matter to you right? Because living in the dark and not knowing the truth makes you feel nice and comfy. Good job you will never progress in life, ;you are the weakest link, goodbye.

  9. qwerty says:

    I fail to see how consumers are helped by knowing the place and time of birth, gender, etc. of the beef they are buying. Merely giving consumers access to that information does not guarantee product safety.

    One wonders if the author of the article has ever been on a farm. I am so tired of hearing about how U.S agriculture is veiled in a cloak of secrecy. I saw Robert Kenner speak at a conference last fall. He admitted he knows nothing about farming, yet he is viewed as an "expert" because he chose to produce a film about it. ???

    As someone who works in agriculture, I can tell you that there are many, many responsible producers in this country who take excellent care of their animals. Further, they welcome visitors onto their farms. They have nothing to hide. The constant criticism from people who have never even been near a farm is incredibly tiresome.

Leave a Reply

Randy Poehlman

Balancing time between Canada and Japan and living in today and yesterday a globe-trotting formerly small-town Canadian boy, currently in the Kansai region of Japan. Writing about Japanese Politics, International Relations, Defence Issues, Nuclear Weapons and other topics of interest.

Articles by this author
Search the site