Interview: Alexis Stoumbelis, director of El Salvador Solidarity organisation, on mining-related deaths in the country
The international community has joined with the anti-mining movement in El Salvador in calling for a thorough and transparent investigation into all of the assassinations, the attempted kidnappings and the death threats to find out who is really behind this violence
By Matt Kennard on Friday, February 19th, 2010 - 783 words.
Below, Alexis Stoumbelis (AS) discusses the issues around the murders and anti-mining resistance.
MK: Why has there been such a concerted campaign against Pacific Rim’s gold mine?
AS: The biggest opposition to Pacific Rim’s gold mine is due to the community’s concerns about severe environmental damage, specifically the risk of cyanide contamination and the massive amounts of water that would be used during the extraction, estimated at 10.4 liters/second. This is a very rural community that depends on farming, cattle ranching and fishing, all of which are at risk if the mine were to open. Also, the community borders the Lempa River, which provides drinking water to over half the population of the capital city. After community leaders like Ramiro Rivera and José Santos Rodriguez visited a community affected by gold mining in Honduras and saw the terrible public health impact of cyanide, it really catalyzed the community organizing to stop the mines from opening in Cabañas. Ramiro Rivera was killed on December 20th and José Santos Rodriguez’ partner Dora Alicia Sorto Recinos was killed on December 26th while carrying their 2 year old son.
MK: Are PacRim suspected to be involved in the murders?
AS: Many community members in San Isidro and Nueva Trinidad believe that Pacific Rim is involved in the murders due to their personal interactions with paid company “promoters” like Oscar Menjívar, who was arrested for the attempted murder of Ramiro Rivera in August. Pacific Rim denies he was ever an employee.
The international community has joined with the anti-mining movement in El Salvador in calling for a thorough and transparent investigation into all of the assassinations, the attempted kidnappings and the death threats to find out who is really behind this violence. The systematic and targeted nature of these murders suggests a concerted effort to eliminate the leadership of an effective resistance movement and to intimidate others out of joining the struggle. If I were a detective, I would ask, “Who stands to benefit from eliminating the leadership of an anti-mining movement?”
One thing that is clear is that the continued presence of Pacific Rim in the community despite widespread opposition and despite having been denied the mining permits has created a climate of violence, regardless of whether they are directly involved or not. The only ethical thing for the company to do at this point is to leave El Salvador and to withdraw the lawsuit.
MK: Has the conduct of mining companies in the developing world improved over the last decade or so?
AS: The recent murders of mining organizers in Mexico and Guatemala, and horrendous toxic waste spills such as at Barrick Gold’s North Mara mine in Tanzania, makes it very hard for the mining companies to convince us that their conduct as improved. What has changed is the mining companies’ attention to and investment in projecting an image of themselves as socially and environmentally responsible. In many ways this has been due to effective consumer campaigns like “No Dirty Gold” and some increased regulation but the companies have responded by changing their image, not by profoundly altering their conduct. Why else would they spend so much time and money lobbying against environmental or labor regulations?
MK: Do you think the protests will succeed?
AS: Yes. The community has already won the struggle and Pacific Rim will not be able to open the mine.
The community protests in San Isidro forced Pacific Rim to cease most operations in 2008 and street blockades in Trinidad prevented the mining equipment from entering the neighborhood. In just a few years, the National Coalition against Metallic Mining in El Salvador has transformed mining from a local concern to a national issue; in 2007, over 62% of the population was opposed to mining according to a poll by the University of Central America. The opposition to mining has become so widespread that the presidential candidates from every political party, including the most conservative, spoke out against gold mining before the 2009 elections.
El Salvador alone has the decision whether or not to grant Pacific Rim the mining permits, which they have twice denied. In desperation, Pacific Rim has brought a lawsuit for hundreds of millions of dollars against El Salvador through CAFTA and the World Bank but the World Bank does not have the authority to grant the mining permits. The lawsuit is a last-ditch effort to salvage some profits, but Pacific Rim has already lost, as the El Dorado mine will not open.
(0 rating, 2 votes)
Loading ...3 Comments
Leave a Reply
Matt Kennard
26London
Matt Kennard graduated from the Journalism School at Columbia University as a Toni Stabile Investigative scholar in 2008. He now works for the Financial Times in London. He has written for the Guardian, Salon, The Comment Factory and the Chicago Tribune, amongst others. In 2006 he won the Guardian Student Feature Writer of the Year Award
mattkennard@thecommentfactory.com
Articles by this author
-
The Observer's Chomsky fetish
Chomsky is big enough to put up with this kind of rubbish, but can the Guardian or Observer, the most influential left-wing journal in the English-speaking world, really not find one journalist who doesn’t have a visceral dislike of Noam Chomsky? Sadly, but maybe predictably, for a newspaper made up of liberals pickled in the self-righteous playfields of Oxbridge liberalism, I guess they don’t
-
The fight to preserve Latin America's democratic revolution
For Prof Anderson the template of Spain after Franco’s destruction of civil society “has become the general formula of freedom: no longer making the world safe for democracy, but democracy safe for this world.” Through a confluence of historical factors, Latin America is the crucible where the last chance to make a world safe for democracy is being fought. The importance of this battle shouldn’t be underestimated: if it fails, we might not get another chance
-
Jan Nederveen Pieterse on Globalization and Empire
The fundamentals of American weakness are its shrinking share of world manufacturing, its gargantuan consumption, low savings rate, faulty policies (massive military spending, massive war spending, deep tax cuts) and gigantic financial deficits. Some problems are structural (high American health care costs are a function of lack of restraint on pharmaceutical industries and reflect the large influence of business interests); this prompts outsourcing, which further weakens the American economy. The military interventions are destabilizing (increase risks for others) and costly (adding to American economic problems) and erode American legitimacy. So the problems are not merely overstretch
-
Massive Attack on influences, war and the cult of fame
I think a lot of it is damaging and I feel there has to be at some point a change in the way we deal with different peoples situations and development. I hate double standards more than anything – I hate the current row over Iran’s nuclear ambitions and whether they should be allowed to have nuclear technology or even nuclear energy. It seems to me that our history is littered with hypocrisy and I find that quite hard to live with being a British citizen
-
Matt Kennard on Russia Today extended: 'US Army sent 'hardcore' neo-Nazi troops to Iraq and Afghanistan'
Under the Bush administration, the U.S. military allegedly started to recruit neo-Nazis and gang members to fight in Afghanistan and Iraq. Investigative journalist Matt Kennard talks to RT about his researh into these allegations and other problems in the US military.
-
Tony Benn on the EU, Cuba and Islam
Well I don’t think it helps to go around saying, “Try Blair for war crimes,” if you’re trying to persuade Labour MPs to vote against the war and they are told they’ve got to arrest and see Blair and Cherie locked up. It’s ridiculous. I said this to all the people… I mean it’s mad… I can understand peoples anger, but it is crazy
-
Hilary Benn on aid, the US, Iraq, and Tony Blair
The truth is: The real answer to the question why did we take the decision that we did, is because on the 18th March 2003 a majority of the House of Commons voted to do it
-
Johann Hari on Chomsky, Hitchens, Iraq, and anarchism
But I think Hitchens arguments are so well put and one should engage with them and take them at face value. He says Saddam was intermeshed increasingly with Islam. Zarquawi, for example, was already in Iraq before the war. I don’t agree with his argument on that. Ba’athism and Islamism are different things, and should be opposed for different reasons
-
Polly Toynbee on Iraq and New Labour
No I think it’s very difficult to navigate because for one thing even if you more want to bring democracy to the Middle East more than you want to take the oil – which I think probably is the case now – but such is the fear of fundamentalism that you wonder if you knock over the Saudi’s who takes over? Is it even stronger Wahhabist, and is that even more dangerous, and even less democratic? It’s very difficult
-
Noam Chomsky on the US Empire and hopes and prospects
They hope that China will organize a coalition of peace loving states to stop the militarism and aggressiveness headed by the US and its British ally. Well it's interesting that they have such contempt for American democracy and British democracy: they don't even dream of it coming from within. I don't agree with it - I don't think we have to wait for China to save us from all doom - I think we can do it ourselves
-
Professor Michael Mann on America's incoherent empire
The most you can have is a kind of informal imperialism where the state remains sovereign - you don’t try to interfere in it but you limit its options. This is what, typically, the US has done in Latin America when it is not intervening. The US is formidable. People contrast so-called multilateralism to unilateralist and they think of the United Nations. The US runs the UN and had run the UN for most of the 1990s and that’s what the US can do because the US provides certain resources that no-one else can provide. Nothing much is going to happen in the way of international activity unless the US is part of it and leading it and that’s what the US can return to again. What I think it cannot do is to reconstruct foreign countries on its own without having considerable local support
-
Douglas Murray, neoconservative thinker, on the War on Terror and Islamism
And it goes in very small erosions. It goes in the erosion of a state and a public who see nothing for which they will fight and nothing for which they would die and nothing for which – in that case – they are particularly willing to live. In that situation, a strong ideology, which extremist Islam is, is not only powerful but attractive to much of the Western world and that doesn’t mean necessarily that like John Bert’s son and Jack Straw’s son, are going to convert, but it means they will kowtow to it
Unfortunately not much of this guy's opinion is actually the truth. El Salvador has never once made a decision to approve or deny the mining permit. They've just done nothing.
These international communities he talks about are the ones who don't want poor people to get above poverty like OxFam. They don't care about the people, they just want the status quo to remain in place.
This couldn't be more biased and filled with more falsehoods.
Absolute lies posted here! The only truth is that anti-mining advocacy will say or do anything to stop mining in El Salvador and the rest of Latin America! If these projects would be judged on the real science instead of the selective or inacurrate information supplied to the local activists supplied by supportive socialistic anarchist groups like OXFAM, the truth would come out. Unfortunately, the radical, anti-transnational agenda that exists in part of the FUNES government, coupled with the complete failure of the moral authority of the local Catholic Church that ignores the truth to further it's Liberation agenda and the unregulated funding and sponsership by these anarchist NGO groups to further their advocay will probably win out in the end and not only kill the potential mining industry but will damage El Salvador's image for future foreign investment! Who looses? El Salvador! Who wins? Anti-capitalists and anarchists! The question of environment is only an end to justify the means and not a real one at that!
Oh I forgot to mention one more thing! Google "solidarity" and " El Salvador" together and be prepared to follow the common theme that forms the core of this movement – Socialistic Anarchism