Indian filmstar Shahrukh Khan’s detention at a US Airport – what we should be asking
Indian film star Shahrukh Khan’s detention at New Jersey asks an important question.
By Faraaz Rahman on Wednesday, August 26th, 2009 - 787 words.
So India’s biggest film star Shahrukh Khan has been detained at Newark Newark Liberty International Airport in New Jersey. So what you say? Those of us who travel, have all had to go through these “random” checks at US airports at some point or the other, especially if you happen to have a non American passport. However, even American citizens have not been spared the ignominy of being “randomly” selected for questioning from time to time. This in turn has sparked tremendous outrage in India, and in the internet community via blogs and forums. What really spiced up this issue is a statement by Mr Khan himself, in which he claims that he was targetted because of his surname and religion. Interestingly, Khan was in US to shoot for an Indian film aptly titled “My Name is Khan” which is apparently about the post 9/11 discrimination faced by Muslims in America.
Needless to say, Bollywood, the largest film industry in the world, producing well over 700-800 films a year has reacted with outrage. While most found it silly that the security officials did not know who Shahrukh Khan was, the Indian Information and Broadcasting minister Ambika Sohni has asked for “tit for tat” treatment to be metted out to American citizens visiting India.
It is important to note however that the US officials have very clearly downplayed the issue and have claimed that he was detained because his name came up in a computer generated list.
Personally, I feel that despite the tremendous attention that this topic is generating, in fact, one of my friends joked that Shahrukh Khan managed to divert attention off swine flue in India, the core issue was unfortunately missed. What I suspect has happened here is a classic case of misunderstanding that is so common between two cultures.
Having grown up in the subcontinent, I can bear witness to the fact that in the subcontinent, “migh is right”. If you are a powerful politician, famous celebrity, business tycoon, or related to any of these people, you can get away with even murder, (depending on the level of your power and control). It is all about contacts, references and power over there. So if you are Shahrukh Khan in India, there is no way in hell you will ever have to go through any of these hurdels and security checks that us poor commoners have to go through. In fact, recently I read that a Pakistani singer managed to get the flight she was travelling on to go back to its destination because she had forgotten her bag.
This is why this has become such a big deal in India and this is why the Bollywood film industry, Indian media and Indian politicians are reacting with such outrage and anger.
There is however a section of people who have lauded the security standards of America and associate it with the fact that there has been no terrorist attack on America since 9/11. In a world where a suicide bombing killing less than 20 people does not even make headline news, it is indeed a tremendous achievement.
I mentioned somewhere above that the core issue was missed by everyone. What is this core issue you ask? The reason I am writing about this is not because some film star was detained. This is a big deal because of the what people have to go through at Airports in America now because of 9/11. I have heard much worse and much more humiliating stories from ordinary people. Without any malice or disrespected to the 9/11 victims and their families, it is time the world and especially America got over 9/11.
I am reminded of a piece I had read a long time back on LA Times about putting 9/11 into perspective. I quote the first paragraph from that piece,
IMAGINE THAT on 9/11, six hours after the assault on the twin towers and the Pentagon, terrorists had carried out a second wave of attacks on the United States, taking an additional 3,000 lives. Imagine that six hours after that, there had been yet another wave. Now imagine that the attacks had continued, every six hours, for another four years, until nearly 20 million Americans were dead. This is roughly what the Soviet Union suffered during World War II, and contemplating these numbers may help put in perspective what the United States has so far experienced during the war against terrorism.
This issue has once again posed that tricky question to all of us, did we over react to 9/11? Are such strict security measures that often infringe on civil liberties absolutely necessary to prevent another terrorist attack? I feel THIS is what needs to be debated and discussed rather than what is being discussed now.
5 Comments
Leave a Reply
Articles by this author
-
Draw Muhammad Day is a farce

While both sides are busy taking a side against each other, Draw Muhammad day becomes a nothing more than a farce
-
The Toronto declaration is not a violation of artistic freedom
The protest is not against the individual Israeli filmmakers included in City to City, nor does it in any way suggest that Israeli films should be unwelcome at TIFF. However, especially in the wake of this year’s brutal assault on Gaza, protest is against the use of such an important international festival in staging a propaganda campaign on behalf of what the South African Archbishop Desmond Tutu, former U.S. President Jimmy Carter, and UN General Assembly President Miguel d’Escoto Brockmann have all characterized as an apartheid regime.
-
Indian filmstar Shahrukh Khan's detention at a US Airport - what we should be asking
Indian film star Shahrukh Khan's detention at New Jersey asks an important question.
-
Triumph in adversity: What Pakistan's cricket team tells us about the country
Pakistan's recent World Twenty20 win was more than just a sporting achievement for the beleaguered nation
-
What is terrorism?
In the "City of God," St. Augustine tells the story of a pirate captured by Alexander the Great. The Emperor angrily demanded of him, "How dare you molest the seas?" To which the pirate replied, "How dare you molest the whole world? Because I do it with a small boat, I am called a pirate and a thief. You, with a great navy, molest the world and are called an emperor." St. Augustine thought the pirate's answer was "elegant and excellent."

(No Ratings Yet)
havin grown up in subcontinent, i totally agree with the auther. Im from india and commoners in this country are treated like beggars or thieves. only rich dominate this country, they r the law they r the gov. they can buy n sell anything and anybody. this SRK got the taste of reality. good on the security of USA.
Why are we just sticking such small issue when our own, APJ abdul kalam was also did the same or worse even in our country
that is the biggest shame.
The fact that Shahrukh Khan is associating this incident with his name or religion is beyond my understanding..Its stupid on his part to comment this way when he holds a responsible position in the society..
And why is media reacting on such a petty issue?? Americans are right in what they're doing.When it comes to the country's security, there shouldn't definitely be a compromise.The point is not how commoners are treated in India, but the law is same for everyone.
Last but not the least, Ambika Soni has given the most irresponsible statement.
My reply is in response to Ruchira, Like you said, law should be the same for everyone so why is it that asians are treated differently than the us or europe citizens ? Can't there be any possible threat from them ? Don't you know abt the cases of drug trafficking by US citizens ? Furthermore, if detention of an icon like shahrukh khan seems right don't u think it would equally be justifiable to treat ur hollywood actors the same ? i neva heard Brad Pitt being detained, rather special security is arranged for such actors, not jst in US but also in countries like india. If india treats american stars jst like their own stars then why should not US do the same ?
I agree with Nustafa lthough I am not Indian