How long do we keep Obama’s face on our clothes?
With all this Obama merchandize how will be ever be free of his face? Is the U.S. to become like Syria where our leader’s face is in every store and home? I hope not.
By Wilson Dizard on Monday, November 10th, 2008 - 870 words.
Until the last week before the election, I didn’t wear any sort of Obama paraphernalia. I did collect it, though, in the form of posters and stickers and the wristbands that (nominally non-partisan) PIRG puts out each election year. These were made just for Ohio. I got a bunch of all that stuff. In the last week, I decided to start wearing a shirt I’d made that said ”Barack Obama” on it in Arabic. I wore this to each of my classes once.
Then, for Halloween, I made a t-shirt that said ”Ozymandias” and below “Ozymandias” was “Xerxes.” It was clear to all who saw the shirt that ”Xerxes” was “Ozymandias’” VP pick. Below that was a good old fashioned ‘08. That shirt was my whole costume. But that’s a whole other story altogether.
Anyway, when I went to the Obama rally in downtown Columbus on the Sunday before the election, I spent about 10 dollars on various Obama pins. It was a crazy splurge. In one of them, Obama looks like a stern, wise, alert, and vicious 20th century Arab dictator. It appropriates the ”National Treasure” movie logo and has pictures of Mount Rushmore, The White House, and that big arch deal out in St. Louis. It’s pretty intense.
I’ve been wearing also an understated Barack Obama pin which is just a black and white negative drawing of his smiling face. I managed to wear it to each of my classes this week, but I think I’ll leave it home for my biology lab tomorrow morning.
But why? When after the election does it become weird to wear your newly minted and invaluable artifacts from the first-black-president-elect’s campaign?
In some countries, pictures of presidents don’t come off the walls ever. Syria is a good example. There, it was unusual to see any home, business, blank wall, taxi-cab, or bus-stop without at least one picture of Bashir al-Assad, Syria’s president/king, or Bashir’s predecessor and dead father Hafiz, or his dead heir-apparent brother, Basil, or all of them. Such public displays of loyalty to Syria’s leader might not have been required in some circumstances, but they were always certainly highly recommended. Except for this one Internet cafe I went to all the time, they didn’t have a picture of Bashir, but its owners sure loved him and his strong government that makes Syria safe and so forth and so on.
So what’s the rule for displaying Obama’s visage now that the election’s over? For a while here in Ohio, at least, the place was already starting to look Damascus-esque in its adoration of the candidate. Of course, this was an extremely unusual campaign in that the President’s face was such a prominent part of his canvassing and stickering-everything strategy that carried the state.
There’s a rule, I’m sure it’s written down somewhere, that no American money can feature the face of any living political figure. This is not the case in other countries. England, for instance, stamps its pound notes with pictures of the Queen. They also have 10 pound Charles Darwin notes, too, which are pretty awesome. Rome, for example, did it all backwards. Coins were minted specifically with the Emperor’s profile, in order to assure their authenticity and advertize for Rome and Romans. It seemed to work.
No one would have thought to plaster the country with Clinton’s face for four or eight years. Today, though, so much detritus from this massive presidential campaign still remains that it’s hard to think Obama’s face won’t stick around for a good long while, on car bumpers, street signs, subway surfaces, whatever. But all that can’t last for more than a few months, can it? Maybe the bumper stickers will stay, as it’s hard to remove them, but what about everything else? Would it be appropriate for a business to have a picture of the President on their wall, like almost 100 percent of business have in Syria and other countries, many of them fucked up with war, dictatorship, poverty, etc.
Lebanon does it too, but there are different leader-faces for each town or city. Beirut’s down with the dead Rafik Hariri. Hezbollah’s towns have posters and pics everywhere of Nasrallah and a bunch of other mullahs. The former Phalangists love this bald guy whose name I forget. Druze kick it with some crazy multicolored star I’ve attached to this email.
So what is America becoming? A place where you can show your support for the president any time during his term(s)?
Honestly, I hope so. While I might not go out on the street with an Obama shirt or pin in six months, because I think it’s kind of creepy and unAmerican, I’m sure someone will. As for me, I don’t think I can shake my puritan breeding that stops me from indulging in icon worship or dancing well.
Come to think of it, maybe I’ll wear my sweet black and white Obama pin during the midterm elections in 2010, just to sort of show the colors on game day. Or maybe the day Congress starts debating universal health coverage. Or when the Iraq war ends. Or to graduation, whenever that is. Or to that first post-college job interview with a KBR recruiter.
I’ll have to think about it. You should too.
5 Comments
Leave a Reply
Articles by this author
-
A hard bargain at Copenhagen
That said, the rich world’s motivations for backing the Fund are hardly charitable. The Pentagon has already identified climate change as “threat multiplier.” By threatening food and water supplies, a warmer world undermines the stability of cooperative regimes, like Pakistan’s, central to U.S. strategy. Retired four star Marine General Anthony Zinni puts the American position in stark words. “We will pay for this one way or another,” General Zinni says of climate change. “Either we take an economic hit of some kind, or we pay the price later in military terms. And that will cost human lives.”
-
No, You Owe Us Money!: The logic behind climate debt
A novel political narrative is emerging at the COP15 in Copenhagen. It’s the idea that the rich, industrialized countries owe the developing world a “climate debt.” Right now, according Actionaid and Oxfam, the Global North sits about $200 billion in the red, a sum it must pay out per annum. That’s right, after years of dodging the Global North’s loan sharks, debt-ridden developing world has a reason to demand money from rich countries
-
Water wars in Israel-Palestine
This isn’t the first time an international organization accusing Israel of wrongdoing over water. In the spring, the World Bank produced another study, conducted on behalf of the Palestinian Authority, that accused Israel of retarding Palestinians’ development of the water resources they share with Israel, while also admonishing the Palestinians for less than stellar water management and conservation. This report faced similar recriminations from the Israeli government, charging the World Bank with taking the Palestinians’ side
-
The Semitic civil war: Why one-state is the only answer for Israel-Palestine
The only lasting option for peace, I feel, is one state for two peoples. Two states for two peoples, the current mantra, won’t work. It puts an impossible burden on Israel and won’t leave the Palestinians with anything approaching what we consider sovereignty. The only lasting solution, I feel, is a single state. Indeed, under occupation, Israel and the West Bank and The Gaza Strip have already been a single state since 1967, when Israel’s occupation of Palestinian Territory began. It is much easier to go forward on the path both peoples are on today
-
Hillary Clinton's spineless toadying to the Chinese dictatorship
Hillary Clinton was feted as a human rights advocate, but she's shown this was all a lie.
-
To a Drone: A poem
Wilson Dizard's 'To a Drone'
-
Our generation will be remembered like our grandparents are
We often think of what our grandparents time must have been like, with the Kennedy's and Luther King's, but with all this history now, we can be sure that our grandchildren will think of us in the same historical light.
-
How long do we keep Obama's face on our clothes?
With all this Obama merchandize how will be ever be free of his face? Is the U.S. to become like Syria where our leader's face is in every store and home? I hope not.
-
Massive Obama win in Ohio spurred by students
The massive win in Ohio for Obama was one of the biggest shocks of election 2008. Wilson Dizard watched the events with his fellow students at Ohio State University, a vital demographic grouping that ensured Obama's victory.
-
Somalians for Obama in Ohio
Wilson Dizard reports from Ohio where the Somali community are getting out the vote for Barack Obama.
-
Clean Ohio Fund Act hangs in balance
The Clean Ohio Fund Act is a major piece of legislation to protect the environment in that state. Its funding is now up for ballot and its future uncertain. Wilson Dizard reports.
-
Midwestern values don't exist
Barack Obama is said to have "Midwestern values". But this geographical value structure is rubbish invented to manipulate us.

(No Ratings Yet)
Obama is much more Of The People than any president in recent memory, especially in the memory of our generation. He is such by nature of the way his campaign was built (3 million individuals donated, not to mention how the offices were built out of bazillions of regular-person volunteers); he is also such because he is black to the blacks (or, more accurately, biracial and so also a part of the immigrant community and white community), an intellectual to the intellectuals, a Kansas boy to the midwesterners, etc. etc. etc. He is also less old and puffy than 99% of US politicians (or, in the words of Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, “young, handsome and tanned”). All of these factors make people more inclined to have his image around in the first place and to keep it around now that the election is over. I am guessing many identity groups– including people of color and also “the youth”– who think of him as their envoy will keep his image around for the duration of his presidency, if not beyond (barring some major mistake on his part). What does that mean for everyone else? I'm gonna go with “keep 'em around until they stop giving you a warm and fuzzy feeling inside.”
Hold on to your stash, it could be worth something: http://www.smartmoney.com/Spending/Deals/Are-Ob...
i think that it's a different if a leader is democratically elected. The deification of leaders from prehistory like Ataturk in Turkey is weird though, I don't think will happen with Obama, although it could. I think the cult of personality around Obama is the reason his administration won't live up to its promise; people are sitting back now, happy that the task is done, whereas they should take off the badges and get critical….
Also, we are viewing this from one angle. I have seen pictures of George W Bush in people's houses and stickers still with his name. Obama has got a popular appeal yet Bush was and is still loved by some Americans, and they adorn their possessions with his face, but at present it's 'cool' to be behind Obama. I agree with Matt too. This “Yes we did” stuff is ridiculous and people wearing badges that say “hope” or “change” as if everything has been achieved. it is a positive thing that has happened but it is the time to be critical and see some substantial change not relax
I really think anyone who has George W Bush's face on their wall now should be sectioned!